Added: Jousha Latshaw - Date: 31.03.2022 23:02 - Views: 15836 - Clicks: 8272
Take-home message: -Women have an organ analogous to the male prostate that is able to produce a liquid that can be ejaculated Really come on women orgasm. Not all women produce ejaculate. Herophilos of Chalkedon made the first scientific description of what would later be named the female prostate in BC, and Aristotle, Hippocrates, the Kama Sutra, and Galen all made further description of female ejaculation prior to In a Dutch researcher, Regnier De Graafmade a clinical description of the female prostate using modern scientific methods.
But from here on the story of female ejaculation gets messy. Societal ideas of femininity, masculinity, gender and sexuality seemed to influence the scientific study of female ejaculation. A lot of good studies on the topic got overlooked, and some bad science got overused. The tale of female ejaculation and the female prostate is important to tell not only because many women still struggle with orgasms, sexual fluids and their sex lives, but also because it serves as a shining example of how culture can influence science.
At the beginning of the 20 th century a renaissance of female ejaculation studies occurred. Despite his status as a respected researcher his thorough descriptions of the female ejaculation were seen by academia as anecdotal at best and falsified at worst. If the work of experts was not being recognized, it seemed unlikely that others would have luck publishing pro-female ejaculation research.
And indeed, after Grafenberg came quite a bit of writing outright rejecting the notion of female ejaculation.
The few papers in support of female ejaculation that were published postulated that female ejaculation might originate from small glands located just below the urethra. At the same time, another theory started making waves:that female ejaculation was just urinary incontinence. But, for all of the papers being published, no actual studies were being performed. The landscape of research shifted slightly after this case study, as the goal was no longer to prove or disprove the existence of the female ejaculation, but now to classify its composition and source.
The only studies opposing this conclusion were performed by Goldberg et al. Goldberg tested six women, Alzate only one. Most of the urine analysis studies compared female ejaculate with urine across some variation of chemical parameters: creatinine a muscular waste producturea the main component of urinepH, prostate specific antigenor glucose. There are many reasons why the concentrations of these components in urine may change.
There is a space between being certain ejaculate is not urine and being certain that it is, and that is where this study lies. The evidence pointed to a female prostate that was the source of female ejaculate, as well as a highly functioning hormone producing organ, with function very similar to the male prostate. He also wrote that there was massive variation in prostate size, function and component ratio from woman to woman. These variations could explain why only some women ejaculate, and why the volume and colour of that ejaculate seemed so variable.
And they argued over the very definition of ejaculate. Did an ejaculation originate, by definition, exclusively from a penis? Did an ejaculation need to contain sperm? Regardless of what it was called though, it seemed that the world had finally reached a consensus that women have prostates and can expel a fluid upon orgasm that is not urine.
Research in support of female ejaculation continued to appearand systematic reviews, like this one by Pastor, further highlighted that female ejaculation was not due to urinary incontinence. Now raise your hand if you see problems with this study. A small sample size with no selection for a history of ejaculation, non-varied demographics, and no G-spot stimulation despite evidence that that is the mechanism by which ejaculation is triggered.
We now know it can suffer from the same diseases as the male prostate, like carcinoma, prostatitis, and prostate cancer. New studies have found antimicrobial compounds, similar to those found in male ejaculate, in female ejaculate. So, it may be that female ejaculation could confer a protection against UTIs. One of the last remaining mysteries was highlighted in a study that took pelvic ultrasounds of seven women who self-reported experiencing ejaculation.
It found that before and after orgasm the bladders of the women were empty, but during the build up to orgasm, the bladder rapidly filled, and then rapidly emptied upon ejaculation. The current evidence points to women not only ejaculating but experiencing two types of ejaculations : a small-volume ejaculate that is milky in colour and that originates primarily from the prostate, and a clear, larger-volume ejaculate originating primarily from the bladder.
The bad science that paved the historical road of female ejaculation has had some serious effects. Our sordid history of female prostate denial has created a society unwilling to accept its existence, despite the scientific evidence. In Britain banned pornographic depictions of female ejaculation, claiming that the fluid ejaculated is really urine.
They justified this on the basis that urine is unsterile and could cause an infection if a participant had an open wound. In the most serious sense, cases of female prostate cancer and chronic UTIs have likely gone undiagnosed or untreated. In a less life-threatening sense, many women have had to face a body of evidence Really come on women denies their everyday sexual experience. When we let poorly performed studies, misinterpretedand gendered assumptions drown out real evidence, we make mistakes, delay discoveries, and end up looking pretty dumb in retrospect.
I Really come on women fascinated that there still remain mysteries to uncover about our bodies, and truly excited to see what research is being done on female ejaculation and the female prostate now. Want to comment on this article? Here's it posted on our Facebook ! keywords. -Up Here.
The road to the discovery of the female prostate was one paved with sexism and bad science. And it still seems to be. Why, for example, is female ejaculation ignored in medical textbooks? Ada McVean B. Really Sure? There was actually one more study, inthat denied female ejaculation. It suffered from some serious flaws however.
How do you know? Acrylic Encounters 1 Sep From Bugs to Plastics 20 Aug Are we at risk from wearing clothing with detectable amounts of PFASs or phthalates? Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram. Accessibility Log in.Really come on women
email: [email protected] - phone:(499) 970-4829 x 1842
What Do Our Gender Symbols Really Mean?